The first (as far as anyone I know is aware) Context-Driven conference in Europe is quickly approaching. On May 7-9, 2012 in Stockholm, Sweden, Let's Test "A European conference on context-driven testing - for testers, by testers" will take place.
This is a CAST inspired conference, meaning that it focuses on in-depth exploration of topics, includes facilitated discussion as part of every talk (i.e. speakers don't get to "run out of time" as soon as they hear that "hard question") and conferring only increases between and after sessions. It's a fabulous format! If you haven't experienced it, and you are passionate about testing, you really want to -- it will change your perspective on conferences forever.
I am proud to say that I will not only be attending Let's Test 2012, but that I am honored to be on the program with some first-run content that I'm very excited about:
A Full Day Tutorial: Context Appropriate Performance Testing, from Simple to Rocket Science
A Keynote: Testing Missions in Context From Checking to Assessment
This is where Scott Barber shares his thoughts, opinions, ideas and endorsements related to software testing in general, performance testing in specific, and improving the alignment of software development projects with business goals and risks.
Showing posts with label Mission. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mission. Show all posts
Monday, April 2, 2012
Friday, March 16, 2012
Business Value of Testing: Find Bugs ≠ Mission
My introduction to software testing was as a performance tester. Before the completion of my first project, I had a firm understanding of the primary mission of performance testing. That understanding has changed very little to this day, though I have improved how I communicate that mission. Currently, I phrase the (generic) primary mission of performance testing as:
However; when I was first asked to help out with some functional testing, I quickly realized that I didn't really know what was expected of me, so I asked. As you might imagine, folks looked at me like I'd grown a second head... a green one... with scales and horns. After about the 4th time I asked the question, got a funny look, watched as it became clear I was serious and received some variant of the answer:
"To find how many, how fast, how much and for how long; to assist business w/ related technical and/or business decisions and/or; to support related improvement activities as prioritized by the business."That certainly doesn't mean that all performance testing efforts include every aspect of that mission, but I'm hard pressed to imagine something that I'd call performance testing that includes none of the aspects of that mission. It is also true that I have experienced all manner of secondary missions as part of a performance testing effort (missions related to fail-over, and denial of service attack security, for example). Those combinations, permutations, variations and additions are all where context comes into play.
However; when I was first asked to help out with some functional testing, I quickly realized that I didn't really know what was expected of me, so I asked. As you might imagine, folks looked at me like I'd grown a second head... a green one... with scales and horns. After about the 4th time I asked the question, got a funny look, watched as it became clear I was serious and received some variant of the answer:
"Find bugs"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)